AI Angst and Social Media Scrutiny Fuel Tech Backlash: A Nation’s Growing Distrust

Silicon Valley's long-held aspiration to improve the world is increasingly colliding with a public perception of a tech-induced nightmare. The meteoric rise of artificial intelligence pioneers like OpenAI and Anthropic has amplified existing anxieties about the technology sector. Many Americans now associate AI with potential job displacement and view the proliferation of massive data centers in their communities with growing alarm. Compounding these concerns, the previous wave of technological innovation brought forth social media platforms so addictive that Meta, facing a landmark settlement, agreed to pay up to $17 billion to dozens of state attorneys general.

Amidst persistent inflation that has eroded consumer confidence to a seven-month low, the public observes trillion-dollar tech corporations expanding their influence, often helmed by the planet's wealthiest individuals. Sarah Myers West, co-executive director of the AI Now Institute, expressed to CNBC, "If this technology takes off in the way that you see the CEOs of AI Labs talking about, we're facing a significant impact to our economy, to people's jobs, to their sense of sense of agency." She added, "There are lots of members of the public that don't want to see that vision roll out."

A recent Pew Research Center report indicates that over half of Americans are more concerned than excited about the expanding use of AI, a notable increase from 37% in 2021. Similarly, a poll by the Searchlight Institute found a strong majority of voters believe social media negatively impacts society.

Public trust in AI executives is particularly low, according to a CNBC Generation Lab survey of 18- to 34-year-olds. Over 75% of respondents distrusted Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei to act responsibly, with similar sentiments directed towards OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. This widespread public skepticism poses a significant challenge for Anthropic and OpenAI, both valued near $1 trillion and preparing for potentially monumental IPOs. The AI backlash is anticipated to be a key risk factor in Anthropic's IPO prospectus.

Dario Amodei acknowledged the public's apprehension in a recent X post, stating, "I think it is fundamentally a crisis of trust... I think that ordinary people don't trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over. The causes of this go back decades, and AI is just the latest iteration of it." Experts suggest the tech sector's backlash is reaching unprecedented levels, overshadowing discussions about AI's potential benefits. "Treating it as a PR problem and a problem of public sentiment would be tremendously misguided," West advised. "To improve public sentiment requires really meaningfully contending with where the public is at and what they want in a more meaningful way than just, 'Can we convince you to get on board?'"

AI data centers, essential for training and running AI models, have become a focal point of public anger, serving as a tangible representation of the widespread resentment towards AI. In the first quarter of this year, approximately $130 billion worth of data center projects faced blockages or delays due to local opposition, according to Data Center Watch. This figure in just three months nearly matched the disruptions seen throughout all of 2025. Groups like the Stop Data Centers Coalition are advocating for a national moratorium to allow for thorough examination of the environmental, societal, and economic impacts of these facilities. Emily Wurth of Food and Water Watch highlighted concerns including water usage, increased utility costs, emissions, noise pollution, and the encroachment on agricultural land. She noted significant local opposition in states like Arizona, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, suggesting that companies and legislators may have underestimated the public's reaction.

The outrage has even permeated the tech workforce. Amazon engineers, for instance, testified before the Seattle City Council, urging greater regulation of AI data centers and criticizing the company's reliance on "dirty energy" at some locations. James Coleman, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, observed, "There's not a lot of trust necessarily in the utilities and the regulators, given the higher electricity prices that we've seen over previous years." However, not all perspectives are negative. Jennifer Huddleston of the Cato Institute pointed out that many unions support data centers due to the construction jobs and ongoing need for electricians and HVAC professionals. The major companies behind this construction boom assert they are meeting the immense demand for services that drive advancements in fields like medical research and precision farming. Nonetheless, opposition to data centers has emerged as a critical issue in the upcoming midterm elections, with candidates across the political spectrum voicing their concerns. The National Republican Senatorial Committee has identified data centers as a potential "sleeper issue" for the election cycle.

The backlash has extended into the tech workforce, with Amazon engineers advocating for stricter government oversight of AI data centers and criticizing the company's use of "dirty energy." James Coleman, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, commented on the prevailing distrust, stating, "There's not a lot of trust necessarily in the utilities and the regulators, given the higher electricity prices that we've seen over previous years." Conversely, Jennifer Huddleston, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, noted that many unions support data centers due to the construction and maintenance jobs they provide. The major tech companies, or "hyperscalers," argue that they are responding to overwhelming demand for services crucial to advancements in areas like medical research and precision farming. Despite these arguments, opposition to data centers has become a significant flashpoint in the midterm elections, with both Democratic and Republican candidates speaking out against them. The National Republican Senatorial Committee has deemed data centers a "sleeper issue" for the election cycle.

Jim Steyer, CEO of Common Sense Media, asserts that bipartisan opposition to Big Tech extends far beyond data centers, stating that Americans are "fed up" with the practices of many major technology companies. "There is genuinely a techlash, and it's not partisan at all," Steyer told CNBC, emphasizing its widespread nature across political divides and geographic locations. This week's settlement involving Meta stems from a lawsuit filed by a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general who accused the company of endangering children and teens through its social media platforms like Instagram and Facebook. As part of the settlement, Meta will implement significant product changes and pay substantial penalties. These changes include a default two-hour daily time limit for teens on Facebook and Instagram, muted notifications during school hours, and enhanced parental controls. California AG Rob Bonta, who co-led the case, stated, "It's a floor conceptually, not a ceiling." Steyer hailed the settlement as a "well-deserved victory" reflecting broad public sentiment and a "qualitatively different moment" in terms of the tech backlash, urging Big Tech leaders to take note.

The issue of surveillance is also prominent, exemplified by the Atlanta startup Flock Safety. Flock's technology, which captures license plate data and uses AI for analysis, is deployed in thousands of U.S. cities. Critics allege that law enforcement has misused this technology for stalking and wrongful accusations. Ahead of the midterms, politicians from both parties have called for increased regulation. Abdul El-Sayed, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan, criticized his Republican opponent for enabling the proliferation of these systems. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis described the systems as "out of control," while President Donald Trump indicated his stance is "under review." According to DeFlock, an advocacy group, over 90 cities have deactivated, rejected, or canceled Flock contracts this year. A Flock spokesperson, however, stated that new city partnerships significantly outpace nonrenewals and that the company welcomes regulation of automated license plate reader technology, having implemented features to detect abnormal search activity. Jay Stanley, a senior policy analyst with the American Civil Liberties Union, believes the controversy surrounding Flock aligns with broader resentments toward AI, data centers, and the influence of tech billionaires, noting a "long-term grassroots bipartisan suspicion of this kind of surveillance."

—CNBC's Annie Palmer and CJ Haddad contributed to this report.

WATCH: Tusk Venture’s Bradley Tusk on what data centers need to do to gain trust