Oil prices experienced a notable increase on Thursday, driven by ongoing geopolitical tensions between the United States and Iran. The situation has raised concerns about potential disruptions to oil shipments through the crucial Strait of Hormuz.
Recent statements from President Donald Trump suggest a potential escalation of military action if a peace deal isn’t reached, further unsettling markets and impacting oil futures. Analysts point to the duration of this conflict as a key factor affecting future economic growth and interest rate policies.
- Investors are closely monitoring Middle East developments amid rising tensions between Iran and the U.S.
- President Donald Trump stated that Iran would face significantly increased bombing if a peace deal isn't reached.

Oil prices experienced a surge on Thursday amidst volatile trading sessions, as market participants closely evaluated the latest unfolding events in the Middle East. Heightened concerns over escalating tensions between Iran and the United States have refocused attention on the risks associated with the critical Strait of Hormuz shipping lane.
International benchmark Brent crude futures for July delivery saw an increase of 0.67%, reaching $101.95 per barrel. Concurrently, U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures for June also climbed, gaining 0.65% to settle at $95.70 per barrel.
Scott Chronert, Citi's U.S. equity strategist, emphasized that the prolonged duration of the conflict could significantly impact the broader economy.
"The duration of the conflict and the implication that has for higher oil prices for longer is a big deal as it pertains to future growth expectations for many parts of the market, as well as how it influences the Fed thinking in terms of the interest rate dynamic," Chronert commented during an appearance on CNBC's Squawk Box.
Despite recent reports suggesting that Washington and Tehran might be approaching an agreement to de-escalate the conflict, President Donald Trump stated on Wednesday that Iran would face bombing "at a much higher level" if it did not agree to a peace deal. These remarks have amplified market worries that negotiations between Iran and the U.S. to end the war remain precarious.
The U.S. military offensive, dubbed Operation Epic Fury, "will be at an end" if Iran "agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption," Trump stated in a Truth Social post.
Should an agreement be reached, the U.S. naval blockade of Iranian ports in the Gulf of Oman would then "allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran," Trump added.
Conversely, Trump warned that "if they don't agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before."
President Trump's remarks follow an Axios report indicating that the U.S. and Iran were nearing a concise, 14-point memorandum of understanding designed to conclude the war and establish a framework for subsequent negotiations.
In response to Trump's Truth Social statement, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baqaei informed news outlets on Wednesday that Tehran is still examining the proposal and intends to convey its decision to mediators in Pakistan.
In an X post published after Trump's announcement, Baqaei seemed to reference the International Court of Justice, writing, "The concept of 'negotiations' requires, at the very least, a genuine attempt to engage in discussions with a view to resolving the dispute (ICJ, Judgement of 1 April 2011, para. 157)."
He further elaborated, "It needs 'good faith', then, meaning that 'negotiations' is not 'disputation'; nor is it 'dictation', 'deception', 'extortion' or 'coercion.'"
Marc Sievers, former U.S. Ambassador to Oman, shared his insights on CNBC's "Access Middle East" on Wednesday, highlighting that the primary focus has been on the complete reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
"The immediate focus has been on a full reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, allowing all of this international commerce and energy to flow smoothly, tankers full of oil and so forth that have been blocked up, and that there would be no toll imposed by the Iranian IRGC on tankers to pass," he explained.
— CNBC's Chloe Taylor and Kevin Breuninger contributed to this report.
