Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s commitment to staying in California, despite a potential new wealth tax (Proposition 40), has intensified the debate ahead of the midterm elections. The company has introduced a new stock incentive plan to help Zuckerberg manage potential tax liabilities without diminishing his voting control.
This move underscores Zuckerberg’s position as one of the few tech centibillionaires remaining in California, drawing a stark contrast with peers who have relocated to states like Texas and Florida.
Meta's Zuckerberg Sticks with California, Igniting Wealth Tax Firestorm Ahead of Election
In a move that has amplified the debate around a potential wealth tax, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has committed to remaining in California for at least eight years. This decision, formalized through a new stock incentive plan, comes as California voters prepare to decide on Proposition 40, a measure that would impose a significant tax on billionaires residing in the state. Zuckerberg's continued presence in California, particularly as one of the few tech centibillionaires still based there, has turned the wealth tax debate into a high-stakes issue just weeks before the midterm elections.
The disclosure, made in a filing coinciding with Meta's third-quarter earnings report, highlights the unique situation for tech's wealthiest. Zuckerberg, the world's sixth-richest person with a net worth around $225 billion, remains in California alongside Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang. In contrast, other prominent tech figures like Elon Musk and Michael Dell have relocated to Texas, while Jeff Bezos primarily resides elsewhere. Larry Page and Sergey Brin, co-founders of Google, have moved to Florida, as has Oracle founder Larry Ellison.
Proposition 40, if passed, would levy a 5% tax on Californians with a net worth exceeding $1 billion. The filing from Meta explicitly addressed the potential tax burden, stating that if enacted, Zuckerberg "would effectively be paying to serve as the Company's chief executive officer while residing in California," despite his nominal $1 annual salary. To mitigate this, Meta has introduced a new class of non-voting common stock (Class C) effective January. Zuckerberg will receive these shares as a dividend and can sell up to 20% immediately, allowing him to cover potential tax liabilities without compromising his voting control.
The tech industry has largely opposed Proposition 40. Numerous high-profile individuals, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, Stripe CEO Patrick Collison, venture investor Peter Thiel, and DoorDash CEO Tony Xu, have contributed to campaigns opposing the measure. Notably, Collison and Xu are current members of Meta's board, while Thiel served on the board until 2022. Sergey Brin has expressed concerns about California's direction, while Jensen Huang has indicated it would be a "privilege" to pay the tax.
Despite support from figures like Senator Bernie Sanders, recent polls suggest Proposition 40 may not achieve the necessary majority support to pass. A Citrin-Politico poll indicated 46% in favor versus 43% opposed. Meta views Zuckerberg's leadership as critical to its future, especially its ambitions in artificial intelligence and its collaboration with the Meta Superintelligence Labs, led by AI chief Alexandr Wang.
The decision to issue Class C stock ensures Meta can raise capital without diluting Zuckerberg's voting power, preserving his influence and vision, which the company believes is instrumental to long-term value creation.
Watch: 'Fast Money' traders react to Meta's Q3 results
'Fast Money' traders react to Meta's Q3 results as stock climbs in extended trading
